What I found interesting with regard to Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy's positions is his stand in favor of respect and discipline at school and he is proposing some tough measures to punish juvenile crime. Well, he'd better do, taking into account the recent events in the Parisian suburbs. (If that works, the U.S. may need a hand there).
I was also pleased with what he said about Turkey not joining the E.U., although it may still enjoy a privileged commercial relationship. He said that France's and Europe's borders cannot be extended to Iran and Uzbekistan. And that's true. I understand the commercial point, but since there are already differences leading to upheaval among the different religious and racial groups in countries such as France, Denmark and the U.K., how could Europe possibly integrate some hundred million Asiatic Muslim people? It will be the end of western civilisation as we know it.
On the other hand, Mme. Segolene Royal's points on social issues are by far more sound and humanitarian and I am all for what she said about pensions and integration of special needs children. I think this was the best appearance she has made so far. She was calm and strong at the same time, well read, and I liked the way she confronted Mr. Sarkozy about the huge difference in rhetoric and action of his government.
She has also made some very good points and she has put forward some great ideas about alternative sources of energy, and about the importance she intends to put on study and education. After all, these are Europe's strengths, and these strengths have always fertilized the world. With regards to Europe, I think her victory would mean yet another standstill and going backwards and forwards for Europe. So, no, I think we wouldn't agree there.
More on the debate and a summary of the issues covered by each candidate, this is an interesting article by B.B.C. news.
Although I was all for her during the debate, I do think that it may be too late for her to reverse the climate in favor of her opponent.
Ideally I'd love to see Sarkozy leading France's European and foreign policy and Mme Royal taking charge of the social issues.
Why can't people vote on issues (instead of take it or leave it politics), and make up governments truly Democratic?